Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T02:01:51.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shcal04 Southern Hemisphere Calibration, 0–11.0 Cal Kyr BP

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

F G McCormac*
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Palaeoecology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, United Kingdom
A G Hogg
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand
P G Blackwell
Affiliation:
Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
C E Buck
Affiliation:
Department of Probability and Statistics, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7RH, United Kingdom
T F G Higham
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, 6 Keble Rd., Oxford OX2 6JB, England
P J Reimer
Affiliation:
School of Archaeology and Palaeoecology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, United Kingdom Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry L-397, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA.
*
Corresponding author. Email: f.mccormac@qub.ac.uk.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Recent measurements on dendrochronologically-dated wood from the Southern Hemisphere have shown that there are differences between the structural form of the radiocarbon calibration curves from each hemisphere. Thus, it is desirable, when possible, to use calibration data obtained from secure dendrochronologically-dated wood from the corresponding hemisphere. In this paper, we outline the recent work and point the reader to the internationally recommended data set that should be used for future calibration of Southern Hemisphere 14C dates.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Arz, HW, Patzold, J, Wefer, G. 1998. Correlated millennial-scale changes in surface hydrography and terrigenous sediment yield inferred from last-glacial marine deposits off northeastern Brazil. Quaternary Research 50:157–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbetti, M, Hua, Q, Zoppi, U, Fink, D, Zhao, Y, Thomson, B. 2004. Radiocarbon variations from the Southern Hemisphere, 10,350–9700 cal BP. Nuclear Instruments & Methods in Physics Research Section B—Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 223–24:366–70.Google Scholar
Braziunas, TF, Fung, IY, Stuiver, M. 1995. The preindustrial atmospheric 14CO2 latitudinal gradient as related to exchanges among atmospheric, oceanic, and terrestrial reservoirs. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 9:565–84.Google Scholar
Buck, CE, Blackwell, PG. 2004. Formal statistical models for estimating radiocarbon calibration curves. Radiocarbon, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haug, GH, Hughen, KA, Sigman, DM, Peterson, LC, Rohl, U. 2001. Southward migration of the Intertropical Convergence Zone through the Holocene. Science 293:1304–8.Google Scholar
Hodell, DA, Brenner, M, Curtis, JH, Guilderson, T. 2001. Solar forcing of drought frequency in the Maya lowlands. Science 292:1367–70.Google Scholar
Hogg, AG, McCormac, FG, Higham, TFG, Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Palmer, JG. 2002. High-precision radiocarbon measurements of contemporaneous tree-ring dated wood from the British Isles and New Zealand: AD 1850–950. Radiocarbon 44(3):633–40.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M. Review of tropospheric bomb 14C data for carbon cycle modeling and age calibration purposes. Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M, Zoppi, U, Fink, D, Jacobsen, G. 2002. Radiocarbon in tropical tree rings during the Little Ice Age. In: Abstracts for the Ninth International Conference on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS-9). Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
Kromer, B, Spurk, M, Remmele, S, Barbetti, M. 1998. Segments of atmospheric 14C change as derived from late glacial and early Holocene floating tree-ring series. Radiocarbon 40(1):351–8.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Hesshaimer, V. 2000. Radiocarbon—a unique tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics. Radiocarbon 42(1):6980.Google Scholar
Luckge, A, Doose-Rolinski, H, Khan, AA, Schulz, H, von Rad, U. 2001. Monsoonal variability in the northeastern Arabian Sea during the past 5000 years: geochemical evidence from laminated sediments. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 167:273–86.Google Scholar
Marret, F, Scourse, JD, Versteegh, G, Jansen, JHF, Schneider, R. 2001. Integrated marine and terrestrial evidence for abrupt Congo River palaeodischarge fluctuations during the last deglaciation. Journal of Quaternary Science 16:761–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maslin, MA, Burns, SJ. 2000. Reconstruction of the Amazon Basin effective moisture availability over the past 14,000 years. Science 290:2285–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCormac, FG, Hogg, AG, Higham, TFG, Lynch-Stieglitz, J, Broecker, WS, Baillie, MGL, Palmer, J, Xiong, L, Pilcher, JR, Brown, D, Hoper, ST. 1998. Temporal variation in the interhemispheric C-14 offset. Geophysical Research Letters 25:1321–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCormac, FG, Reimer, PJ, Hogg, AG, Higham, TFG, Baillie, MGL, Palmer, J, Stuiver, M. 2002. Calibration of the radiocarbon time scale for the Southern Hemisphere: AD 1850–950. Radiocarbon 44(3):641–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Hughen, KA, Guilderson, TP, McCormac, FG, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Barratt, P, Beck, JW, Buck, CE, Damon, PE, Friedrich, M, Kromer, B, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, van der Plicht, J. 2002. Preliminary report of the first workshop on the IntCal04 Radiocarbon Calibration/Comparison Working Group. Radiocarbon 44(3):653–61.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Damon, PE, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2003. Extension and revision of the radiocarbon calibration data set: Part 1 IntCal04 12.4–0 ka cal BP. 18th International Radiocarbon Conference, Wellington, New Zealand, 4 September 2003.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Ramsey, CB, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 26–0 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Sparks, RJ, Melhuish, WH, McKee, JWA, Ogden, J, Palmer, JG, Molloy, BPJ. 1995. 14C calibration in the Southern Hemisphere and the date of the last Taupo eruption: evidence from tree-ring sequences. Radiocarbon 37(2):155–63.Google Scholar
Vogel, JC, Fuls, A, Visser, E, Becker, B. 1993. Pretoria calibration curve for short-lived samples 1930–3350 BC. In: Stuiver, M, Kra, RS, editors. Calibration 1993 issue. Radiocarbon 35(1):7385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X, Auler, AS, Edwards, RL, Cheng, H, Cristalli, PS, Smart, PL, Richards, DA, Shen, C-C. 2004. Wet periods in northeastern Brazil over the past 210 kyr linked to distant climate anomalies. Nature 432:740–3.Google Scholar
Westbrook, JA, Guilderson, TP, Colinvaux, PA. Forthcoming. Annual growth bands in Hymenaea courbaril. Iawa Journal. Google Scholar